Thursday, March 28, 2024
Thursday, March 28, 2024
Get the Daily
Briefing by Email

Subscribe

NISMAN’S SUSPICIOUS DEATH POINTS TO GOV’T COVER-UP & THE GLOBAL REACH OF IRAN-BACKED HEZBOLLAH

We welcome your comments to this and any other CIJR publication. Please address your response to:  Rob Coles, Publications Chairman, Canadian Institute for Jewish Research, PO Box 175, Station  H, Montreal QC H3G 2K7 

 

Contents:

 

Something Is Rotten in Argentina: Natasha Zaretsky, Tablet, Jan. 21, 2015— On Sunday night, Alberto Nisman, the federal prosecutor leading the investigation of the 1994 bombing of the AMIA (the Argentine Jewish Mutual Aid Society) in Buenos Aires was discovered dead from a gunshot wound to his head, alone in his bathroom, hours before he was to present controversial findings before a Congressional Committee.

Argentine Phone Calls Detail Efforts to Shield Iran: Jonathan Gilbert & Simon Romero, New York Times, Jan. 21, 2015— Intercepted conversations between representatives of the Iranian and Argentine governments point to a long pattern of secret negotiations to reach a deal in which Argentina would receive oil in exchange for shielding Iranian officials from charges that they orchestrated the bombing of a Jewish community center in 1994.

Did Iran Murder Argentina’s Crusading Prosecutor Alberto Nisman?: Christopher Dickey, Daily Beast,  Jan. 19, 2015— Since 2005 Argentine prosecutor Alberto Nisman has been crusading for his vision of justice in the horrific 1994 bombing of the AMIA Jewish center in Buenos Aires that killed 85 people and injured hundreds more.

Canada is Playing Both Sides With Iran: J.L. Granatstein, National Post, Jan. 20, 2014 — The Middle East remains the most dangerous of global flashpoints.

 

On Topic Links

 

The AMIA Bombing in Buenos Aires: Its Cover-Up and Investigation (Video): JCPA, Jan. 23, 2014

Argentine President Now Says Prosecutor’s Death Was Not a Suicide: Jonathan Gilbert & Rick Gladstone, Wall New York Times, Jan. 22, 2015

“I Am Nisman”: Tara Helfman, Commentary, Jan. 20, 2015

Israeli TV Shows ‘Iranian missile’ That ‘Can Reach Far Beyond Europe’:  Times of Israel, Jan. 21, 2014

                   

                            

SOMETHING IS ROTTEN IN ARGENTINA                                                                               

Natasha Zaretsky                                                                                                           

Tablet, Jan. 21, 2015

 

On Sunday night, Alberto Nisman, the federal prosecutor leading the investigation of the 1994 bombing of the AMIA (the Argentine Jewish Mutual Aid Society) in Buenos Aires was discovered dead from a gunshot wound to his head, alone in his bathroom, hours before he was to present controversial findings before a Congressional Committee. The July 18, 1994, attack killed 85 people and wounded hundreds, also destroying the principal Jewish community center in Argentina, home to the largest Jewish population in Latin America. Though this was the most significant terrorist attack in Argentine history, it remains unsolved after 20 years of problematic investigations and judicial efforts.

 

In the years after the bombing, Iran and Hezbollah were suspected of having responsibility for the attack, though they denied any involvement. An official investigation took place, resulting in a trial that concluded in 2004 without any convictions. Because of the advocacy work of the group Memoria Activa (Active Memory), the Interamerican Commission for Human Rights declared in 2005 that Argentina failed to provide justice in the AMIA case. President Néstor Kirchner first assigned Nisman to be the special prosecutor in 2004 and, according to Nisman, refused to negotiate with Iran. At that time, Nisman noted that Iran had approached the Foreign Ministry proposing a deal to purchase Argentine wheat for US$4 billion, if Argentina ended its prosecutorial efforts against Iranian suspects—something the president rejected. Nisman formally accused Iran and Hezbollah of bearing responsibility for the bombing in 2006; in 2007, Interpol had issued arrest warrants for six Iranians suspected of involvement.

 

Yet after President Kirchner’s 2010 death, Nisman described an abrupt policy shift under the leadership of his wife, President Cristina Fernández de Kirchner. Nisman, who was of Jewish descent but not observant, detailed these allegations in an accusation he filed last Wednesday, claiming he had records from phone taps that corroborated his findings. He argued that President Cristina Kirchner chose to essentially indemnify Iran in the investigation, directing her Minister of Foreign Affairs Héctor Timerman to remove Iran from the AMIA case (and even pursue false local connections)—all to improve trade relations, hoping to exchange Argentine grain for Iranian oil. Nisman confirmed he had verified phone records supporting his claims against the president, her minister Timerman, and other government functionaries. The political shift to improve relations with Iran also explains the controversial 2013 Memorandum of Understanding between Argentina and Iran, intended to establish a joint “truth commission” to investigate the AMIA bombing. Many doubted the possibility that such a commission would lead to any truth and felt it would instead ensure that justice would not be attained. According to Nisman, its purpose was political—to help with Argentina’s negotiations with Iran.

 

On Monday, Jan. 19, Nisman intended to present the evidence he discovered before Congress. Yet he was found dead the night before in his apartment—leaving this evidence and the future of the investigation uncertain. According to preliminary autopsy results, Argentine authorities claim no third party was involved, suggesting a suicide. However, the timing of Nisman’s death has left many Argentines questioning whether this was in fact a suicide and seriously concerned about whatever possibilities remain for justice and truth in the AMIA case…                                                                                                  

[To Read the Full Article Click the following Link—Ed.]               

                                                           

Contents                                                                            

 

                                     

 

ARGENTINE PHONE CALLS DETAIL EFFORTS TO SHIELD IRAN                                             

Jonathan Gilbert & Simon Romero                                

New York Times, Jan. 21, 2015

 

Intercepted conversations between representatives of the Iranian and Argentine governments point to a long pattern of secret negotiations to reach a deal in which Argentina would receive oil in exchange for shielding Iranian officials from charges that they orchestrated the bombing of a Jewish community center in 1994. The transcripts were made public by an Argentine judge on Tuesday night, as part of a 289-page criminal complaint written by Alberto Nisman, the special prosecutor investigating the attack. Mr. Nisman was found dead in his luxury apartment on Sunday, the night before he was to present his findings to Congress. But the intercepted telephone conversations he described before his death outline an elaborate effort to reward Argentina for shipping food to Iran — and for seeking to derail the investigation into a terrorist attack in the Argentine capital that killed 85 people.

 

The deal never materialized, the complaint says, in part because Argentine officials failed to persuade Interpol to lift the arrest warrants against Iranian officials wanted in Argentina in connection with the attack. The phone conversations are believed to have been intercepted by Argentine intelligence officials. If proved accurate, the transcripts would show a concerted effort by representatives of President Cristina Fernández de Kirchner’s government to shift suspicions away from Iran in order to gain access to Iranian markets and to ease Argentina’s energy troubles. The contacts came at a time when Iran was seeking to raise its profile in Latin America. In recent years, Iran has forged close ties with leftist governments in Venezuela and Bolivia, while also turning to large commodities producers like Brazil for food imports and as a counterweight to its isolation by the West over its nuclear program.

 

Officials in Mrs. Kirchner’s government have lashed out at Mr. Nisman and his assertions before and after his death, saying that he had been manipulated by Antonio Stiusso, a former senior intelligence official ousted by the president in December. Aníbal Fernández, the presidential secretary, described Mr. Nisman’s complaint on Wednesday as “absolutely feeble.” The complaint asserts that the negotiators included Argentine intelligence operatives and Mohsen Rabbani, a former Iranian cultural attaché in Argentina charged with helping to coordinate the bombing. In one transcript from 2013, an Argentine union leader and influential supporter of Mrs. Kirchner said he was acting on the orders of the “boss woman,” adding that the government was open to sending a team from the national oil company to advance the negotiations. “He’s very interested in exchanging what they have for grains and beef,” said the union leader, Luis D’Elía, referring to a powerful Argentine minister with whom he had just met. Another intercept shows negotiators talking about ways to place blame for the bombing on right-wing groups and activists. Yet another transcript includes a discussion about swapping not just Argentine grains, but weapons as well, for Iranian oil.

 

“The publication of Nisman’s complaint is a first step that can contribute to the transparency of an investigation plagued by mystery and frozen for 20 years in a tomb of impunity,” Fernándo González, an editor at the newspaper El Cronista, wrote on Wednesday, arguing that it would pave the way for new investigators and for Mrs. Kirchner to defend herself. Mr. Nisman asserted for years that Iran had helped plan and finance the bombing, and that its Lebanese ally, the militant group Hezbollah, had carried it out. His body was found at his apartment on Sunday with a gunshot wound to his head in a murky episode that government officials have called a suicide. An investigation by a prosecutor is underway. Some experts, including a former American F.B.I. agent who helped the Argentines in their investigation, have questioned the claims of direct Iranian involvement in the bombing. Still, Argentina had limited relations with Iran for years, partly because of the investigation’s importance to the nation’s large Jewish population.

 

Then, in 2013, Argentina announced that it had reached an agreement with Iran to establish a joint commission to investigate the attack. The move was backed by Argentina’s Congress but faced stiff resistance by some who feared that it would make an impartial investigation unlikely. An Argentine court declared the agreement unconstitutional last year, and the government pledged to appeal. Just last week, Mr. Nisman, 51, raised tensions further by accusing top Argentine officials, including Mrs. Kirchner, of conspiring with Iran to cover up responsibility for the bombing. He said the effort seemed to begin with a secret meeting in Aleppo, Syria, in January 2011 between Héctor Timerman, Argentina’s foreign minister, and Ali Akbar Salehi, Iran’s former foreign minister. At the meeting, the complaint contends, Mr. Timerman informed his Iranian counterpart that Argentina was no longer interested in supporting the investigation into Iran’s possible role in the attack. Instead, Argentina initiated steps toward a détente, with an eye on improving trade between the two countries. After this meeting, Mr. Nisman said a covert team of Argentine negotiators, including Mr. D’Elía, who has publicly asked whether Israel was to blame for the 1994 bombing, tried in vain to exchange Iran’s immunity for oil.

 

Mr. Nisman said the negotiators, including intelligence agents, were given the task of “constructing a false hypothesis, based on invented evidence, to incriminate new authors” of the 1994 bomb attack. Mr. D’Elía declined to comment on Wednesday night. Mr. Timerman, the foreign minister, has rejected Mr. Nisman’s accusations, emphasizing that Argentina had not asked Interpol to lift the warrants. Mrs. Kirchner’s cabinet chief, Jorge Capitanich, also sought to discredit the findings, saying that Argentina had not imported crude oil from Iran. Separately, Telám, the official news agency, called the complaint a “labyrinth of inconsistencies,” contending that an operative identified by Mr. Nisman as an intelligence agent was not linked to Argentina’s intelligence secretariat. It also said that grain exports were carried out by agribusiness companies, arguing that the government could not have reached a deal without them.

 

While the complaint made it clear that a deal did not reach fruition, contending it fell apart because of frustrations on the Iranian side, other countries have pursued oil-for-food exchanges in the region. In the Caribbean, Hugo Chávez, then the president of Venezuela, agreed to supply oil to the Dominican Republic partly in exchange for imports of food like black beans. But a deal with Iran would carry additional risks. A spokeswoman for the Treasury Department in Washington declined to comment on whether oil shipments from Iran to Argentina would be in violation of the sanctions enacted over Iran’s nuclear program. But on its website, the Treasury Department explains that bartering for Iranian oil could result in sanctions.

 

Either way, during the period in which the secret negotiations were unfolding, Iran re-emerged as an important trading partner for Argentina, at a time when the country was seeking new markets for its commodities in the Middle East and Asia. “Trade improved significantly between Argentina and Iran since 2010 with large surpluses in Argentina’s favor, before dropping off in 2014,” said Juan Gabriel Tokatlián, an international relations expert at Torcuato di Tella University in Buenos Aires, pointing to annual trade volumes of more than $1 billion a year this decade, compared with negligible levels in the previous decade. Beyond trade, the warming relations between Argentina and Iran extended into the diplomatic realm, according to the intercepted calls. “We’re doing very well,” Ramón Héctor Bogado, who is identified in the complaint as an Argentine intelligence operative, said about the signing of the 2013 memorandum on a joint investigation into the bombing. “We have to work calmly,” Mr. Bogado told a man identified in the complaint as go-between on the Iranian side. “We have a job to do for the next 10 years.”

 

But in just a few months, the transcripts suggested, the mood had changed as it became clear that Interpol would not lift the arrest warrants on the Iranians. “It looks like” Argentina’s foreign minister “messed up,” the go-between for Iran is quoted as saying in the complaint after returning from Tehran in May 2013, when it was becoming clear that Interpol would not remove the warrants.    

                                                           

Contents                                                                                                

                                                   

 

DID IRAN MURDER ARGENTINA’S CRUSADING                                                        

PROSECUTOR ALBERTO NISMAN?                                                                                

Christopher Dickey                                                                                                        

Daily Beast, Jan. 19, 2015

 

Since 2005 Argentine prosecutor Alberto Nisman has been crusading for his vision of justice in the horrific 1994 bombing of the AMIA Jewish center in Buenos Aires that killed 85 people and injured hundreds more. He claimed that Iran was behind it and, more recently, that the Argentine government was trying to block his efforts to prove that. On Sunday night, Nisman was found dead in his apartment, only hours before he was set to testify before an Argentine parliamentary commission about his allegations. The circumstances revealed thus far by the police suggest a suicide. The history of Iran’s operations overseas inevitably suggests otherwise. And there are disturbing echoes of the world 20 or 30 years ago when Tehran, often in league with its clients in Hezbollah, waged a global war on the enemies of the Islamic Republic, deploying hit teams second only to the Israelis in their skill at assassination…

 

Nisman’s eventual focus on direct Iranian involvement, accusing Tehran of planning and financing the attack and Hezbollah operatives of carrying it out, was not universally supported, even by U.S. investigators who followed the case. “The guilt field was painted with a bit too broad a brush,” former FBI agent James Bernazzani told The New York Times in 2009. Bernazzani had led U.S. investigations of Hezbollah throughout the 1990s and said that while he was “convinced” of the group’s involvement, “we surfaced no information indicating Iranian compliance.” In the world of intelligence, however, as distinct from the world of criminal justice, there has been little question that Iran was behind the AMIA bombing in 1994 and the earlier car-bomb attack on the Israeli embassy in Buenos Aires in 1992 that killed 29 people. At the time, the Israelis were attacking Hezbollah leaders and Iranian clients in Lebanon, Hezbollah and Iran struck back wherever they thought they could. “It’s an ongoing game, playing by the rules of the Bible,” a senior official in Israeli intelligence told me at height of the carnage, meaning the rule of eye for an eye, “and at a certain point there is a balance of terror where everyone knows what’s expected.” The Iranians also targeted with a vengeance any opposition figures they thought might be dangerous. In 1991, after a failed attempt years before, they managed to talk their way into the home of Shahpour Bakhtiar, the Shah of Iran’s last prime minister. He thought they were friends. They were searched by police at the door. They killed him with a knife from his own kitchen. The younger brother of then-President Hashemi Rafsanjani was named as a suspect in the case.

 

Between 1987 and 1993, according a French government memo published in a very detailed study called Le Hezbollah Global, between 1987 and 1993 some 18 opponents of the Tehran regime were murdered in Europe, and the CIA estimated that between 1989 and 1996 the Hezbollah network carried out 200 serious attacks costing hundreds of lives. By the late 1990s, the Iranian government apparently decided to slow these operations after several of them started to bring down too much heat. The Germans conducted a relentless investigation of the murder of Kurdish leaders in Berlin in 1992, tracing them back to the then-head of Iranian intelligence, Ali Fallahian. The AMIA bombing in 1994 caused international outrage. And the bombing of the Khobar Towers apartments in Saudi Arabia in 1995, which killed 19 Americans, was eventually traced to another group of Iranian acolytes. Finally, Imad Mugniyeh, seen as the key Hezbollah operative in many of the group’s terrorist attacks, dating back to the bombing of the U.S. Marine barracks in Beirut in 1983, was blown up with a well-placed car bomb in Damascus in 2008. The Israelis generally are credited with that hit. But by then, Hezbollah guerrillas in Lebanon had fought a successful war of attrition that led to Israel’s withdrawal from Lebanese territory in 2000 after decades of occupation. Building on that victory, Hezbollah became, and remains, the most powerful political party in the country.

 

Since then it has focused its actions on a sustained but relatively controlled standoff with Israel, apart from a brutal war in 2006 when it fought the vaunted Israeli army to a standstill. And in the last two years it has deployed in Syria to fight against the Sunni-led rebellion there, including the forces of al Qaeda and ISIS, that threaten the Assad regime. Iran, for its part, has been trying to show itself a reasonable member of the community of nations by negotiating with the Americans and Europeans about the future of its nuclear program. Yet there have been signs within the last few days that the game as old as the Bible continues, and may once again grow very dangerous. Last week, Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah boasted that his organization now has weapons that can strike anywhere in Israel. “We have made all necessary preparations for a future war,” he said. Then on Sunday, Israeli forces killed Jihad Mugniyeh, son of the late mastermind, and several other Hezbollah officers who were operating in the Syrian sector of the Golan Heights. The Israeli press reported they had been planning attacks on Israeli targets. Was Alberto Nisman somehow caught up in this long war of assassinations? Or did he decide for reasons we probably cannot know to end his own life? The investigation will continue, unless somebody stops it.                       

                                                                       

Contents                                                                            

 

                                                             

CANADA IS PLAYING BOTH SIDES WITH IRAN                                                                   

J.L. Granatstein                                                                                                  

National Post, Jan. 20, 2015

 

The Middle East remains the most dangerous of global flashpoints. The Syrian civil war goes on, with Turkey, a NATO member, supporting the Assad regime [Syria is in fact an enemy of Turkey—Ed]. Every other NATO member disagrees, though some prefer one or another of the opposition forces and some in the West are beginning to see President Assad as the best counter to the permanent ruination of Syria. No NATO member supports the Islamic State (ISIS), its brutality such that all remain horrified as its tentacles spread into Iraq and toward the Saudi Arabian border. Then there is Al Qaeda, which has fought ISIS for the role of lead player in terror. Al Qaeda claimed credit for the Charlie Hebdo attack, but ISIS said it had planned the Paris kosher supermarket killings. If the attacks are signs of cooperation between bitter enemies, this can only promise more chaos.

 

More important, however, is that Iran has deployed substantial numbers of its Revolutionary Guard’s elite Al Qods brigades into Iraq and Syria to fight ISIS. In the last 10 days, ISIS claimed to have wiped out an Al Qods forward command group, including its commanding general, north of Baghdad. ISIS embellished its account by claiming to have killed 555 Iranian officers in the last four months of 2014. The next day, Jan. 14, Debka, the Israeli defence and intelligence website, stated flatly that General Qassem Soleimani, the Al Qods commander-in-chief and hitherto the prime inspirer of anti-Western devilment in the area, had been gravely wounded by an ISIS suicide squad in Iraq. The Iranians promptly denied this claim, but Soleimani has not been seen in public recently.

 

Then on Jan. 18, an Israeli helicopter strike in Syrian territory in the Golan Heights killed five Hezbollah officers and six Iranian officers, one a general. Shiite Iran is the sponsor of the Shiite Hezbollah in Lebanon and has supported its efforts to support Assad in Syria with cash and weapons. The Israelis bitterly oppose Hezbollah, which wants to destroy it and, although Jerusalem’s relations with President Obama’s Washington are presently testy, the U.S. (or, at least, its Congress) steadfastly supports Israel with arms and money. Complicating matters further is that the Western allies, including the United States, Britain, France and Canada, have aircraft bombing ISIS targets in Iraq and Syria (the Canadians however limiting themselves to Iraq). The West and Iran are cooperating against ISIS. Simultaneously, the West, not including Canada, is beginning to relax the sanctions against Tehran imposed because of its efforts to develop nuclear weapons, thanks to an interim agreement reached in late 2014 and coming into effect this month.

 

Politics makes strange bedfellows indeed, but not much can be stranger than this. Led by the Americans, hitherto the Great Satan to the Iranian leaders, the ties between the West and Iran are becoming tighter, each side reacting to the horrors of Islamist fundamentalism throughout the region. The Iranians have been hurt by sanctions, and they are being wracked even more by the falling price of oil. Easing curbs on trade and Iranian banks may mitigate the effects of the oil price collapse. That collapse has been caused by the Saudi Arabian government’s refusal to cut production. The Sunni Saudis are desperately afraid of Shia Iran, but their repressive regime also fears ISIS, itself a Sunni organization, which recently struck a Saudi border post, causing casualties. ISIS aims to create a caliphate to lead the global Muslim community, and Mecca, Islam’s holiest site, must be in its hands if the caliphate is ever to be truly credible. Of course, Saudi princes and financiers for years have backed the most militant Sunni terrorists, including ISIS. In the Middle East, you can’t tell the players without an up-to-date program, but the enemy of my enemy is my friend. Maybe.

 

Curiously, Canada is playing both sides here. The Harper government unilaterally cut diplomatic relations with Iran in 2012 and has expressed its unhappiness with the interim nuclear deal. Foreign minister John Baird’s anti-Iran rhetoric remains loud — and, as there are some 200,000 Iranians concentrated in suburban constituencies in Toronto and Vancouver, most of them families that fled the clerical government’s repressive policies, his position is likely driven by electoral calculations. But at the same time, the RCAF’s CF-18 aircraft operating against ISIS in Iraq are, de facto, cooperating with the Iranian Revolutionary Guard’s efforts to rebuild the Iraqi armed forces. Ottawa shouts and postures against Tehran while bombing to support its anti-ISIS efforts in Iraq. But then, almost every player in the Middle East seems to be backing two or more horses in every race. The field is crowded and no one can win, certainly not the locals who will continue to be torn to shreds by fundamentalist militants and their enemies abroad.

 

 

Contents           

 

On Topic

 

The AMIA Bombing in Buenos Aires: Its Cover-Up and Investigation (Video): JCPA, Jan. 23, 2014

Argentine President Now Says Prosecutor’s Death Was Not a Suicide: Jonathan Gilbert & Rick Gladstone, Wall New York Times, Jan. 22, 2015—Confronted with a deepening scandal, the president of Argentina abruptly reversed herself on Thursday, saying that the death of a prosecutor investigating the 1994 bombing of a Jewish center was not a suicide as she and other government officials had asserted.

“I Am Nisman”: Tara Helfman, Commentary, Jan. 20, 2015 —On Sunday night, Alberto Nisman, the special prosecutor charged with investigating the 1994 bombing of a Jewish Community Center in Buenos Aires, was found dead in his apartment.

Israeli TV Shows ‘Iranian missile’ That ‘Can Reach Far Beyond Europe’Times of Israel, Jan. 21, 2014—Iran has built a 27-meter-long missile, capable of delivering a warhead “far beyond Europe,” and placed it on a launch pad at a site close to Tehran, an Israeli television report said Wednesday, showing what it said were the first satellite images of the missile ever seen in the West.

           

 

 

 

 

               

 

 

 

                      

                

                            

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Contents:         

Visit CIJR’s Bi-Weekly Webzine: Israzine.

CIJR’s ISRANET Daily Briefing is available by e-mail.
Please urge colleagues, friends, and family to visit our website for more information on our ISRANET series.
To join our distribution list, or to unsubscribe, visit us at https://isranet.org/.

The ISRANET Daily Briefing is a service of CIJR. We hope that you find it useful and that you will support it and our pro-Israel educational work by forwarding a minimum $90.00 tax-deductible contribution [please send a cheque or VISA/MasterCard information to CIJR (see cover page for address)]. All donations include a membership-subscription to our respected quarterly ISRAFAX print magazine, which will be mailed to your home.

CIJR’s ISRANET Daily Briefing attempts to convey a wide variety of opinions on Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish world for its readers’ educational and research purposes. Reprinted articles and documents express the opinions of their authors, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoint of the Canadian Institute for Jewish Research.

 

 

Rob Coles, Publications Chairman, Canadian Institute for Jewish ResearchL'institut Canadien de recherches sur le Judaïsme, www.isranet.org

Tel: (514) 486-5544 – Fax:(514) 486-8284 ; ber@isranet.wpsitie.com

Donate CIJR

Become a CIJR Supporting Member!

Most Recent Articles

Day 5 of the War: Israel Internalizes the Horrors, and Knows Its Survival Is...

0
David Horovitz Times of Israel, Oct. 11, 2023 “The more credible assessments are that the regime in Iran, avowedly bent on Israel’s elimination, did not work...

Sukkah in the Skies with Diamonds

0
  Gershon Winkler Isranet.org, Oct. 14, 2022 “But my father, he was unconcerned that he and his sukkah could conceivably - at any moment - break loose...

Open Letter to the Students of Concordia re: CUTV

0
Abigail Hirsch AskAbigail Productions, Dec. 6, 2014 My name is Abigail Hirsch. I have been an active volunteer at CUTV (Concordia University Television) prior to its...

« Nous voulons faire de l’Ukraine un Israël européen »

0
12 juillet 2022 971 vues 3 https://www.jforum.fr/nous-voulons-faire-de-lukraine-un-israel-europeen.html La reconstruction de l’Ukraine doit également porter sur la numérisation des institutions étatiques. C’est ce qu’a déclaré le ministre...

Subscribe Now!

Subscribe now to receive the
free Daily Briefing by email

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

  • Subscribe to the Daily Briefing

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.