Monday, December 23, 2024
Monday, December 23, 2024
Get the Daily
Briefing by Email

Subscribe

This Could Be the Most Dangerous Legal Event in Israeli History; Sending Barak Makes Sense


Yoav Limor

Israel Hayom, Jan. 8, 2024

“Barak’s challenge will not be simple. South Africa has prepared a serious indictment, relying in part on a host of statements by Israeli public figures who called to destroy / demolish / crush / depopulate Gaza.”
 
The decision to send former Chief Justice Aharon Barak to represent Israel at The Hague’s International Court of Justice is nothing short of dramatic. It underscores the extent of the legal and public relations problem our country is in, prompting the government to ask one of its greatest detractors to represent it in the hearing.

The hearing itself, which will take place this Thursday and Friday following the petition filed by South Africa, is more significant than what Israeli public discourse has made it out to be. In fact, it may be the most dangerous hearing Israel has ever faced. It takes place at the International Court of Justice in The Hague (not the International Criminal Court), based on the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. Israel has of course signed this convention, which has its roots in World War II and the Holocaust, as well as the article that allows any country to sue even if it is not a direct party to the conflict – as South Africa has done. This is also why Israel is participating in the hearing and not boycotting it, as it has done in the past regarding hearings in the International Criminal Court.

The court hears petitions in a full panel of 15 judges from different countries. The hearings themselves last for years, but South Africa also requested a temporary remedy – an order for Israel to stop fighting immediately. The chances of success for such a request are unclear, and the court can also hand down a more lenient ruling instructing Israel to stop actions that endanger civilians, which has the same practical meaning.

Such an order has no direct bearing on Israel, but it could have some countries cite it at the Security Council in their effort to impose military and economic sanctions on Israel. It is also likely that various countries and organizations will see it as confirmation that Israel is committing genocide against Palestinians and use it as a pretext to sever political and economic ties. 

 … [To read the full article, click here]

Donate CIJR

Become a CIJR Supporting Member!

Most Recent Articles

Syria: Is Iran Retreating While Turkey Advances?

0
By David Bensoussan The author is a professor of science at the University of Quebec. For 54 years, the Assad dictatorship, led by father and son,...

The Empty Symbolism of Criminal Charges Against Hamas

0
Jeff Jacoby The Boston Globe, Sept. 8, 2024 “… no Palestinian terrorist has ever been brought to justice in the United States for atrocities committed against Americans abroad.”   Hersh Goldberg-Polin...

Britain Moves Left, But How Far?

0
Editorial WSJ, July 5, 2024   “Their failures created an opening for Reform UK, led by Nigel Farage, a party promising stricter immigration controls and the lower-tax policies...

HELP CIJR GET THE MESSAGE ACROSS

0
"For the second time this year, it is my greatest merit to lead you into battle and to fight together.  On this day 80...

Subscribe Now!

Subscribe now to receive the
free Daily Briefing by email

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

  • Subscribe to the Daily Briefing

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.