CIJR | Canadian Institute for Jewish Research
L'institut Canadien de Recherches sur le Judaisme

Analysis

Maritime Agreement: A Tactical Concession for the Sake of Strategic Gain

 Israel maritime borders with Cyprus and Lebanon.- WIKIPEDIA
Israel maritime borders with Cyprus and Lebanon.- WIKIPEDIA

 

Yoav Limor

Israel Hayom, Oct. 3, 2022

 

“Israel has made a tactical concession for a strategic gain of stability on the northern border.”

 

The emerging maritime agreement with Lebanon is good news. As it is with most deals, it is not perfect, but the alternative – a dangerous escalation on the northern border – would be much worse.

It has three benefits. Firstly, because these are negotiations between Israel and Lebanon, albeit indirect and mediated by the United States. We should not underestimate the importance of an agreement, even if partial, with an enemy state at the heart of which is a terror organization currently posing the greatest threat to the Jewish state. The ability to generate and implement common interests is in its nature a calming and restraining element in a region where there is no shortage of factors that could spark a war.

Secondly, there is the economic aspect. Lebanon is a broken, insolvent country on the verge of anarchy, and the money it would gain from gas drilling would help it stabilize. The claim that the finances will be used for missile and rocket building is nonsense. Hezbollah does not finance its operations with Lebanese taxpayers’ money, but rather with that of Iranian taxpayers. Besides, Hezbollah wants Lebanon to stabilize economically because it is continuously being accused of preventing such a recovery (and rightly so).

And the third benefit is energy. Israel could start producing gas from the Karish field immediately, and at a time when the world is hungry for natural gas and prices are increasing. It will do so without a physical threat to its rigs. The Lebanese rig, which will be placed opposite the Israeli one, will be a restraining factor as both countries will worry about losing valuable maritime assets. Lebanon will also get to reduce its energy dependence on Iran, and strengthen its ties with Western European countries.

However, the main disadvantage of the deal is the possible loss of maritime assets. It is not a border, because the territory in dispute is outside the sovereign territory of Israel, but in the territory where it has “special rights.” source



Subscribe to the Isranet Daily Briefing

* indicates required

Please select all the ways you would like to hear from the Canadian Institute for Jewish Research:

You can unsubscribe at any time by clicking the link in the footer of our emails. For information about our privacy practices, please visit our website.

We use Mailchimp as our marketing platform. By clicking below to subscribe, you acknowledge that your information will be transferred to Mailchimp for processing. Learn more about Mailchimp's privacy practices.

To top