CIJR | Canadian Institute for Jewish Research
L'institut Canadien de Recherches sur le Judaisme

Analysis

Isolationists Relitigate the Iraq War to Let Iran Go Nuclear

President of the United States Donald Trump speaking at the 2017 Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in National Harbor, Maryland.
Credit: Gage Skidmore (Wikipedia)
President of the United States Donald Trump speaking at the 2017 Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in National Harbor, Maryland. Credit: Gage Skidmore (Wikipedia)

 

Jonathan S. Tobin

JNS, June 19, 2025

“Of course, the Trump administration is already part of this war.”

Pundits, like generals, seem always doomed to refight the last war. That’s the main thing to remember as the world watches the debate over whether the United States should join Israel in action to ensure that Iran doesn’t acquire a nuclear weapon. Such weapons have nothing to do with civilian use and everything to do with attempting to perpetrate another Holocaust or to threaten American allies in the Middle East.

For those who oppose action against Iran, the main argument is the obligation not to repeat the mistakes of 2003, when the George W. Bush administration invaded Iraq. For many on the political right, the Iraq War—and to a lesser extent, the war begun in Afghanistan in the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks—were the great original sins of 21st-century American foreign policy. While there were reasonable arguments for American involvement in both conflicts—the Saddam Hussein regime in Iraq and Taliban government in Afghanistan were both despotic, and supported and exported terrorism—they ultimately were undone by the basic problem of sustaining a long-term commitment to wage an unpopular war in a country where the inhabitants did not want America to stay.

Lessons of war in Iraq

Iraq was particularly problematic because the rationale for the conflict was based on a massive intelligence failure. Most of the world, including the American intelligence establishment, believed Saddam when he boasted about possessing weapons of mass destruction. Sitting back and waiting for him to use them was thought to be a catastrophic mistake. That the administration also believed that it could help transform the Middle East by bringing democracy to an Arab and Muslim world in desperate need of it only strengthened the argument for intervention.

While it was easy to believe that a monster like the Iraqi dictator might be working on nuclear or chemical weapons and had, in the past, done so, those programs were, in fact, no longer operating…..Source

Subscribe to the Isranet Daily Briefing

* indicates required

Please select all the ways you would like to hear from the Canadian Institute for Jewish Research:

You can unsubscribe at any time by clicking the link in the footer of our emails. For information about our privacy practices, please visit our website.

We use Mailchimp as our marketing platform. By clicking below to subscribe, you acknowledge that your information will be transferred to Mailchimp for processing. Learn more about Mailchimp's privacy practices.

To top