Saturday, November 16, 2024
Saturday, November 16, 2024
Get the Daily
Briefing by Email

Subscribe

The Liberal Party’s “Too Big” Tent: Part Two

On June 13, 2017, The Right Honourable Justin Trudeau, Prime Minister of Canada, and President/CEO of Women Deliver Katja Iversen announced that Vancouver, Canada will be the official location for the Women Deliver 2019 Conference. (Source: Wikipedia)

 

By Nathan Elberg

In a pre-election blog post I discussed how the tent of the Canadian Liberal Party was large enough to accommodate anti-Semites such as Hassan Guillet, whose creed included the claim that Jews use children’s blood for baking matza.  His racism was made public before the Liberal spin team could counter it.  Guillet was replaced by Patricial Lattanzio, who swept the riding.  Guillet, running as an independent, came in fourth out of eight candidates.

The Liberal parliamentary tent has been reduced to one hundred and fifty-seven members, of whom five are Jewish.  That’s three percent of the Liberal caucus.  According to the website Muslim Link, there are more than double the number of Muslims in Parliament, almost all members of the Liberal Caucus.  Does that mean that Muslims have more than double the influence?

No, according to John Ivison of the National Post.  “Political power,” he says, “is no longer located in cabinet or in Parliament, but is now held by the prime minister and his immediate coterie of unelected advisors.”  And those advisors are the same team who helped him first get elected in 2015. 

So who was it that decided that Canada should vote in favor of a United Nations motion put forward by “the state of Palestine”, North Korea, Zimbabwe and others?  Surely it wasn’t the Parliamentary Liberal Caucus, surely it wasn’t the lame duck Cabinet.  And why did the government make that decision, reversing a long-standing tradition of opposing or at least abstaining on vicious anti-Israel UN resolutions?

The answer lies with the advisors.  Their focus is to get Trudeau elected, and then re-elected. This becomes even more critical when there is a minority government.  Trudeau greatly appreciates symbolic gestures and wants to appear responsive to those for whom it is an article of faith that Judea and Samaria are under illegitimate occupation.  By supporting the North Korean-Zimbabwean motion, he has told the foes of Israel that they are moving closer to the center of the Liberal tent, displacing the friends of Israel who historically held that place.

Donate CIJR

Become a CIJR Supporting Member!

Most Recent Articles

The Empty Symbolism of Criminal Charges Against Hamas

0
Jeff Jacoby The Boston Globe, Sept. 8, 2024 “… no Palestinian terrorist has ever been brought to justice in the United States for atrocities committed against Americans abroad.”   Hersh Goldberg-Polin...

Britain Moves Left, But How Far?

0
Editorial WSJ, July 5, 2024   “Their failures created an opening for Reform UK, led by Nigel Farage, a party promising stricter immigration controls and the lower-tax policies...

HELP CIJR GET THE MESSAGE ACROSS

0
"For the second time this year, it is my greatest merit to lead you into battle and to fight together.  On this day 80...

Day 5 of the War: Israel Internalizes the Horrors, and Knows Its Survival Is...

0
David Horovitz Times of Israel, Oct. 11, 2023 “The more credible assessments are that the regime in Iran, avowedly bent on Israel’s elimination, did not work...

Subscribe Now!

Subscribe now to receive the
free Daily Briefing by email

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

  • Subscribe to the Daily Briefing

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.