CIJR | Canadian Institute for Jewish Research
L'institut Canadien de Recherches sur le Judaisme

Analysis

How Kamala Harris and Donald Trump’s Foreign Policy Would Differ as Commander in Chief

Jonathan Harounoff
NY Post, July 27, 2024

Nowhere would Trump and Harris diverge more than on addressing Tehran’s nuclear weapons program. A Harris administration, notes Jason Brodsky of the United Against Nuclear Iran watchdog, would focus on perpetuating a Biden-esque policy of concessionary soft diplomacy while attempting to revive a nuclear deal.”
 
 Kamala Harris is the presumptive Democratic frontrunner — despite garnering zero votes from the electorate, a failed 2020 presidential bid and difficulties articulating what policy decisions, if any, marked her vice presidency. 
But the 47th president will be tasked with navigating a slate of global quagmires involving China, Russia, Iran and Israel-Palestine. So how would Harris’s foreign policy stand up against Trump’s? 
The VP’s first foreign policy moves since becoming the likely nominee have been characterized more by her absences rather than actions. 
She was missing from Israel Prime Minister Netanyahu’s speech to Congress on Wednesday — an event typically convened by the vice president. Instead, Harrris addressed a historically Black sorority event in Indiana.
Harris also failed to outline any foreign policy objectives in her first campaign rally in the battleground state of Wisconsin on Tuesday, instead paying homage to her octogenarian boss, while vowing to prosecute Trump’s criminal record.
It was a sharp contrast to Trump’s acceptance speech at the Republican National Convention, where he vowed to “end every single international crisis that the current administration had created,” including the wars in Ukraine and Gaza, adding that when he was president “Iran was broke [and] had no money. Now Iran has $250 billion.” 
A lawyer by training, Harris’s foreign policy portfolio is razor thin, marked by record illegal crossings at the US-Mexico border during her tenure as Biden’s unofficial “border czar.”
If Harris were to win the 2024 election, she would mostly stick to Biden’s foreign policy playbook on Iran, China and Russia, while striking a less sympathetic approach toward Israel to appease her party’s progressive bloc. Also dictating Harris’s foreign policy agenda would be her chief foreign policy adviser, Philip Gordon, a former Obama State Department official who helped negotiate Iran’s conciliatory nuclear deal back in 2015. 
… [To read the full article, click here

Subscribe to the Isranet Daily Briefing

* indicates required

Please select all the ways you would like to hear from the Canadian Institute for Jewish Research:

You can unsubscribe at any time by clicking the link in the footer of our emails. For information about our privacy practices, please visit our website.

We use Mailchimp as our marketing platform. By clicking below to subscribe, you acknowledge that your information will be transferred to Mailchimp for processing. Learn more about Mailchimp's privacy practices.

To top