Saturday, April 10, 2021
Saturday, April 10, 2021
Get the Daily
Briefing by Email


Incredible Parallels Between the Purim Story and the Nazi Trials

Rachel Avraham

United With Israel, Feb. 23, 2021

“it appears as if there is merit to the claim that there is a connection between the Purim story and the Nuremberg Trials.”

The haunting connection between these two eras in Jewish history begins with a story from the Talmud in which it is explained that in the Purim story Haman’s daughter committed suicide and thus didn’t need to be hung.

Similarly, following the Nuremberg Trials, Hermann Göring, a well known Nazi cross-dresser, also committed suicide and thus was not hung. In fact, Julius Streicher, the Nazi editor of the anti-Semitic Der Stürmer newspaper, even proclaimed before he was hung, “Purim Fest 1946.”

File:Robert H. Jackson Nuremberg Trial.jpg
Robert H. Jackson Nuremberg Trial.jpg – (Wikimedia Commons)

Indeed, given these facts, it appears as if there is merit to the claim that there is a connection between the Purim story and the Nuremberg Trials.

The Bible specifically states that Haman, the evil Persian Prime Minister who sought to annihilate the Jewish people, was an Agagite. Agag was the King of the Amalekites, implying that all ten sons of Haman were also part of the nation of Amalek.

Interestingly, the great Torah sage the Vilna Gaon explained that the Germans are also descendants of the nation of Amelek. Simon Dubnow, Arthur Szyk and Raul Hilberg also identified the Nazis, who sought to eliminate the Jewish people, as being Amalekites. There are also Talmudic passages that mention a nation called Germania during the Roman Diaspora that seem prophetic in retrospect.

The numbers of people executed in both instances and the fact both the Nazis and Haman’s family were purportedly Amalekites are not the only similarities between the Purim story and the Nuremberg Trials.

According to Dr. Moshe Katz of the Hebrew University, “The ten sons of Haman had already been killed, why bother to hang them? In the writings of the Sages and the commentators, we find several ideas that could clarify this: On the word ‘tomorrow,’ in Esther’s request, the Sages comment: ‘There is a tomorrow that is now, and a tomorrow which is later.’

In other words, Esther was asking that the hanging of Haman’s ten sons not remain an isolated episode in history, but should recur in the future, as well.”

Manuscript [62.0.21]: Painted Esther Scroll (Italy, 18th c… ( Flickr)

Fascinatingly, one finds in the Book of Esther that four of the Hebrew letters in Haman’s sons names utilize small instead of big characters. Jewish sages have taught throughout the generations that whenever there is a variation in the size of a letter or spelling of a word, it has a specific meaning.

If these four small Hebrew letters are used to represent the Jewish number for recording years, it states the year 5707 on the Jewish calendar. 5707 was the year on the Jewish calendar that the 10 Nazi war criminals were hung for committing genocide against the Jewish people.

As Dr. Moshe Katz proclaimed, “Since the trial was conducted by a military tribunal, the sentence handed down should have been death by firing squad, or by electric chair as practiced in the U.S.A. However, the court specifically prescribed hanging, exactly as in Esther’s original request: ‘…let Haman’s ten sons be hanged.’

Though doubts may linger about the connection between the Book of Esther and the Nazi war criminals, the condemned Julius Streicher certainly had none. Through some insight, Streicher appears to have grasped this link to Purim, as revealed by his final shout, with the noose about his neck, mere seconds before he was hanged.”

Emmanuel Bloch in his book “The Code of Esther: A Counter-Investigation” discredits the above narrative based on an overview of the text’s “long and tumultuous history,” during which it went through many textural alterations.  Those interested in reading more are referred to a free kindle edition of his book here. 

Adherence to the ‘Code of Esther’ theory argue that whatever series of events, errors, etc. combined to providentially create this version of Megillat Esther that has been widely used for the past 500 years (although other versions are still around), the end product is a text that enables one to make uncanny connections between it and this modern historical event. — Ed.

Donate CIJR

Become a CIJR Supporting Member!

Most Recent Articles

Jewish Canadian Poetry online anthology series- Northern Poetry. Shira Tzefonit.


Disney Is Trying to ‘Woke-wash’ its Complicity in China’s Human Rights Abuses

BRADLEY MARTIN  NEWSWEEK, 3/18/21 As part of its self-proclaimed commitment to diversity and inclusion, the streaming service Disney+ recently announced that it will be reviewing its library and...

Points to Ponder – 23rd March 2021

  It is ages since I last sent a “Points to Ponder” newsletter. While much seems to be as it was a year ago, there...

A Bicentennial To Mark Modern Zionism

By Moshe Phillips Not many Jews today recall a 19th century Jewish leader who wrote a booklet that inspired young Jews to move to the...

Subscribe Now!

Subscribe now to receive the
free Daily Briefing by email

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

  • Subscribe to the Daily Briefing

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.